Aprios Insights | Expert Perspectives on Manufacturing Innovation

DFM in Injection Molding: Cut Costs, Improve Quality

Written by Nick Erickson | Jul 1, 2025 3:06:00 PM

Designing for manufacturability (DFM) is a foundational practice in the realm of injection molding. It encompasses a series of design choices aimed at streamlining the manufacturing process while promoting the production of high-quality, cost-effective components. When developing parts, particularly for demanding fields such as medical devices, a thorough understanding and application of DFM principles can profoundly influence both the ultimate performance of the part and the efficiency of its production. This article will delve into key DFM considerations, including draft angles, wall thickness, the design of ribs and bosses, and the methodologies for managing tolerances and selecting appropriate materials for optimal injection molding results.

Read More About PEEK: The Ultimate High-Performance Resin for Extreme Conditions

Why Are Draft Angles and Consistent Wall Thickness Important for Molded Parts?

Draft Angles: Facilitating Part Ejection

Draft angles refer to the slight taper incorporated into the walls of a molded part, specifically designed to aid in its easy removal from the mold. Without an adequate draft, parts risk adhering to the mold cavity. This adhesion can lead to defects in the part, extend cycle times, and consequently increase production costs. A general guideline suggests a draft angle of 1 to 2 degrees; however, this can vary based on the specific plastic material being used, the intricacy of the mold design, and the geometry of the part itself.

Properly implemented draft angles facilitate smooth part ejection, minimizing the likelihood of damage to either the part or the mold. This ease of removal also contributes to reduced cycle times, as less time is needed to extract each part, thereby improving overall production efficiency. Furthermore, parts designed with appropriate draft angles are less prone to exhibiting surface imperfections that can arise from sticking or uneven pulling during ejection.

It is important to acknowledge that incorporating draft angles can sometimes present design limitations. This is particularly true when aesthetic requirements or functional needs dictate perfectly vertical walls or highly complex shapes. Designers must balance the need for draft with these other considerations.

Wall Thickness: Striving for Uniformity

Maintaining a consistent wall thickness throughout a molded part is a significant factor in minimizing common molding defects such as warping and sink marks. Variations in wall thickness can lead to differential cooling rates across the part. When one section of a part cools and solidifies faster than another, internal stresses can develop, potentially causing the part to distort or exhibit surface imperfections like sink marks (depressions on the surface opposite thicker sections).

Consistent wall thickness promotes uniform cooling, which is vital for mitigating internal stresses and reducing the tendency for warping. This uniformity also enhances the overall mechanical strength and integrity of the part, lessening the risk of defects. From a production standpoint, even wall thickness allows for more predictable material flow within the mold and can help optimize material usage, reducing waste and cost.

Achieving perfectly consistent wall thickness can be challenging, especially for parts with intricate geometries. It may necessitate adjustments to the part design to promote uniformity. The best practice is to design walls to be as uniform in thickness as feasible. Where changes in thickness are unavoidable, incorporating gradual transitions between thicker and thinner sections can help manage material flow and cooling, thereby optimizing part quality while minimizing material consumption.

Ready to Maximize Molding Efficiency?

Aprios specializes in integrating DFM into injection molding workflows for faster cycles, fewer defects, and enhanced manufacturability.


How Can Rib and Boss Design Enhance Strength and Functionality Cost-Effectively?

Rib Design: Adding Strength Without Bulk

Ribs are thin, wall-like features strategically added to a part's design to provide additional strength and stiffness without substantially increasing overall material usage or wall thickness. When incorporating ribs, it is important that their design does not negatively impact the part's aesthetic appeal or intended function. Well-designed ribs contribute to the structural integrity of the component while helping to keep it lightweight.

The primary benefit of ribs is the increased strength they offer to a part without a significant corresponding increase in its weight or the amount of material used. This material efficiency makes ribs a cost-effective way to reinforce components, avoiding the need for generally thicker walls. Ribs can also assist in distributing stresses across a part and can reduce the potential for warping, especially in larger, flatter sections.

However, poorly designed ribs can introduce challenges. They might obstruct material flow within the mold, potentially leading to incomplete filling of the cavity or causing cosmetic blemishes on the part surface. Additionally, improper placement or sizing of ribs can inadvertently create areas of high stress concentration, potentially forming weak spots in the molded part.

Boss Design: Integrating Attachment Points

Bosses are raised, typically cylindrical features designed into a plastic part to accommodate screws, threaded inserts, or other types of fasteners, facilitating assembly. While bosses are very useful for part assembly, their design must be carefully considered to prevent molding defects. For optimal performance, bosses should be appropriately spaced from each other and other part features, and their dimensions should be carefully calculated to maintain part integrity.

Bosses provide secure points for inserting fasteners, which can simplify the assembly process. Well-placed bosses can also contribute to space efficiency within a product assembly, potentially reducing the need for additional brackets or more complex assembly methods.

If bosses are positioned too closely together or are not designed with the surrounding part geometry in mind, this can lead to molding defects or difficulties during assembly. Similar to general wall thickness rules, the walls of bosses require specific thickness considerations to avoid issues like sink marks on the opposite surface or warpage. This might add a layer of complexity to the design phase.

A guiding principle for both ribs and bosses is to always optimize their placement and dimensions to achieve a balance between strength, functionality, and manufacturability. Incorporating draft angles on vertical surfaces of ribs and bosses, and adhering to proper spacing and wall thickness guidelines, will help prevent defects.

How Do Undercuts and Side Actions Impact Mold Complexity and Cost?

Undercuts are features designed into a molded part that, due to their orientation, prevent the part from being directly ejected from a simple two-half mold in the normal line of draw (the direction the mold opens). These can include features like side holes, grooves, or protrusions that would "lock" the part into the mold. While undercuts enable the creation of more complex and functionally diverse designs, they invariably add significant complexity and, consequently, cost to the construction of the injection mold.

The primary advantage of incorporating undercuts is the enhanced design flexibility they offer, allowing for more intricate part geometries and integrated functionalities. Undercuts can facilitate unique features that would be otherwise very difficult or impossible to achieve with simpler mold designs that only open in one direction.

However, to manufacture parts with undercuts, the mold must incorporate additional mechanisms, such as side actions (also known as slides) or lifters. These are moving components within the mold that retract to allow the undercut feature to be cleared before the part is ejected. The inclusion of these mechanisms makes the mold more complex to design, manufacture, and maintain, directly increasing its cost. This increased mold complexity can also translate into higher production costs per part, potentially due to longer cycle times or more involved mold maintenance.

Whenever feasible, designers should aim to simplify part geometries to eliminate the need for undercuts. If the feature is indispensable, alternatives such as designing the part to be molded in a way that the undercut can be "stripped" or "bumped-off" (if the material is flexible enough and the undercut is shallow), or considering secondary operations like post-molding machining or assembly of multiple simpler parts, might be explored to avoid the increased tooling costs associated with complex mold actions.

Read More About Guide to Optimal Material Choices for Injection Molding

What Is the Relationship Between Tolerances, Precision Requirements, and Cost?

The term "achievable tolerances" refers to the permissible range of variation in a part's dimensions. With high-precision tooling and meticulous process control, it is possible to achieve very tight tolerances, sometimes measured in microns (thousandths of a millimeter), especially when working with plastic materials that exhibit stable and predictable shrinkage behavior. However, striving for tighter tolerances invariably leads to higher costs and more demanding maintenance routines for the molds. For many components, standard manufacturing tolerances are perfectly adequate and represent a more cost-effective approach. Yet, for high-precision components, such as those used in medical devices or aerospace, adhering to tighter tolerances is often a fundamental requirement.

High-precision tooling allows for the consistent production of parts with extremely tight dimensional tolerances and minimal variation from part to part. This consistency is paramount in industries like medical and aerospace, where the precise fit and function of components can have significant implications for performance and safety.

The pursuit of tighter tolerances necessitates more sophisticated and accurately machined tooling, which is more expensive to produce. It also typically requires more rigorous and frequent inspection processes, both for the mold and the parts produced, driving up quality control costs. Furthermore, molds designed for high precision demand more frequent inspection, cleaning, and preventative maintenance to preserve their accuracy over time.

A practical approach is to carefully evaluate and specify only the level of tolerance that is genuinely necessary for the specific function and assembly of your part. For many general-purpose parts, moderate tolerances will be sufficient and will result in a more economical manufacturing process. However, for high-performance products or components subject to stringent regulatory standards, the investment in achieving tighter tolerances may be unavoidable.

Turn Your Designs into Manufacturing-Ready Solutions

Our team ensures your injection molding projects start strong with DFM best practices—saving you time, cost, and complexity.


What Are Key Considerations for Material Selection in Medical Injection Molding?

Common Medical-Grade Thermoplastics

The selection of materials for medical devices is governed by rigorous regulatory standards and the functional requirements of the device, including durability and biocompatibility. Several medical-grade thermoplastics are commonly employed:

  1. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK): This high-performance polymer is renowned for its exceptional mechanical strength, biocompatibility, and resistance to chemicals and high temperatures. PEEK is frequently used in implantable devices, surgical instruments, and components that require repeated sterilization.
  2. Polyetherimide (PEI), often known by the brand name Ultem PEI, offers excellent thermal stability, good strength, and electrical insulation properties. It is often chosen for sterilizable medical device components, electrical connectors, and analytical instrumentation parts.
  3. Polycarbonate (PC): Valued for its transparency, high impact resistance, and good biocompatibility, PC is widely used for medical device housings, connectors, lenses, and single-use devices like syringes.
  4. Thermoplastic Elastomers (TPEs): This class of materials combines the processing ease of thermoplastics with the flexibility and elasticity of elastomers. TPEs are used in seals, gaskets, soft-touch grips, tubing, and other components where flexibility and biocompatibility are needed.

Sterilization Compatibility

A dominant consideration for medical parts is their ability to withstand common sterilization methods. These methods can include gamma radiation, ethylene oxide (EtO) gas, steam autoclaving, and others. The chosen material must not significantly degrade, lose its mechanical properties, or change its appearance as a result of the sterilization process it will undergo.

Materials like PEEK, Ultem, and certain grades of PC and TPEs are selected for their inherent biocompatibility and their capacity to endure harsh sterilization conditions, contributing to the safety and durability of the medical device. These materials are engineered to maintain their essential mechanical and physical properties even after repeated sterilization cycles, supporting long-lasting performance.

It's important to note that medical-grade thermoplastics can be considerably more expensive than standard engineering plastics, which will influence the overall production cost. Additionally, some of these specialized materials may require more precise processing conditions (e.g., higher melt temperatures, mold temperatures, or drying requirements) to ensure their optimal properties are achieved and maintained in the final molded part.

Biocompatibility and Regulatory Considerations

For any component of a medical device that will have patient contact, it is imperative to select materials that meet stringent regulatory standards for biocompatibility. These standards, such as those outlined by the FDA or ISO 10993, are in place to confirm that the material is safe for its intended biological interaction and does not elicit an adverse reaction (e.g., toxicity, irritation, or immune response). Manufacturers must work with material suppliers who can provide the necessary documentation and certifications regarding the biocompatibility testing of their resins.

Why Is DFM a Cornerstone of Successful Injection Molding?

Designing for manufacturability is an indispensable element in optimizing the injection molding process. This is particularly true for industries manufacturing medical devices, where precision, patient safety, and regulatory compliance are non-negotiable. By strategically focusing on aspects such as draft angles, uniform wall thickness, intelligent rib and boss design, and the judicious management of tolerances, engineers can positively influence both the ease of manufacturing and the ultimate performance of the molded part. Furthermore, the careful selection of appropriate materials that fulfill all necessary regulatory and functional requirements is a foundational step for successful medical device production.

At Aprios, we work closely with our clients to apply DFM principles that ensure efficient production and high-quality results. If you're ready to discuss your next medical molding project, contact Aprios today to learn how we can help bring your designs to life with precision and compliance.